Judgemental: social attitudes towards vegetarians
As you may remember from our Judgemental episode we interviewed Dr. Julia Minson at the Wharton School about her research on “Do Gooder Derogation” - the phenomenon of people thinking worse of those who are behaving morally or prosocially (PDF of the Minson and Monin paper).
Listen to my full extended interview with her (she laughs endearingly like Marge Simpson doesn’t she?):
Some of you might be questioning the whole premise saying to yourself “hey, do people really think that vegetarians are doing good?”. But that is what Julia found.
Even though people tend to rate themselves as better than others, and (Dr Minson found) more moral than others, even meat-eaters rated vegetarians as more moral than average (i.e. other) meat-eaters.
Some other tidbits from the study:
- People rated vegetarians more negatively when they thought vegetarians were more judgemental
- In an experiment where people were randomly assigned to a condition in which they had to consider how much vegetarians would judge them morally, they later rated vegetarians more negatively
- Meat eaters expected vegetarians to judge them three times more negatively than vegetarians actually judged them (-1.11 vs -0.33)
- When participants were given the opportunity to negatively rate vegetarians they expressed more pro-vegetarian attitudes
The conversation led me to thinking about “anti social punishment”, where individuals punish those who are more prosocial/generous than the norm (which I mentioned to Julia).
The conversation also made me think about how people manage status and moral inconsistency.
Recently I read “Why Everyone (Else) Is a Hypocrite“, in which Robert Kurzban argues that moral inconsistency is the result of our minds having different components with different goals.
Say: One part of your mind wants to get up early and go for a jog and another wants to sleep in. Kurzban explains that we enforce moral rules because we want other people to follow them, but there’s another part of our minds that wants us to disregard the moral or social norms and take advantage of whatever benefits we can get. This makes us all hypocrites. (See Kurzban giving the gist of his argument)
To me the Minson and Monin paper is a good example of how people are competitive about their moral status.
From an evolutionary perspective advertising that you are a consistently moral person – who for example keeps promises and avoids inflicting suffering on others – makes you a more attractive partner for social exchanges.
If you think someone is making you look bad by being more moral than you or simply judging you as being less moral, then they can do damage to your social reputation.
In turn you must derogate them, that is, advertise that they are not such great social exchange partners either. For example, participants in the Minson & Monin study described vegetarians as “weird”, “preachy” and “sadistic”.
That’s why people were more accepting of vegetarian attitudes when they had a chance to first derogate vegetarians; the attitudes were less threatening when individuals felt that they had done something to climb back up in the moral hierarchy.
This leads to some conclusions
- People are always going to look hard for perceived hypocrisy on the part of organizations that make them feel like they are not behaving morally. After all, I’ve been told that “vegetarians are hypocrites because Peta kills animals”, but they didn’t stop to level the same criticism at the food industry lobbying group that runs the “Peta Kills” website. (Peta runs shelters which have very high kill rates; Peta blames this on taking in desperate cases). Unless someone challenges your moral reputation, there’s no need to search for moral inconsistencies.
- Those who consider moral goodness and consistency to be an important part of their self identity are going to be even more likely to derogate those who they perceive are trying to “one up” them morally especially in the animal domain. I have found that people who really value their relationships companion animals like cats and dogs to be very reactive to discussions about meat eating.
- Above and beyond judgement the perceived moral goodness of vegetarianism/veganism is what causes the negative backlash. If people really believe “I make my food choices and you make yours and they’re all morally equivalent” there would be no reason to derogate vegetarians, certainly if they are minding their own business in the way Julia describes in our interview.
About DianaMy two greatest ideological passions are the pursuit of an understanding of human nature and ethics towards nonhuman animals. I use my scientific understanding and my training as an experimental psychologist to shed some light on the topics we tackle. I'll also introduce a generous helping of irreverent American humor. Read more ...
Most Popular Now
- Cats: Ethics. With Erin Red, Evolution Diet’s Eric Weisman, and vets Lorelei Wakefield, Andrew Knight, and Jean Hofve March 13, 2013
- Cats: Can they be vegan? With vets Lorelei Wakefield, Andrew Knight, and Jean Hofve; and special guest Erin Red February 1, 2013
- Extended interviews on iTunes, starting with Dr Julia Minson January 8, 2013
- South East Asia: Finding Vegan Food in Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand and Cambodia November 28, 2012
- Judgemental: with Colleen Patrick-Goudreau, Dr Julia Minson, and Marla Rose October 6, 2012
- London Olympics: Closing Update with Vx, Animals in the Opening Ceremony, and Vegan Food August 13, 2012
- London Olympics: interview with Kara Lang, vegan Olympian, Canada soccer team August 9, 2012
- London Olympics July 27, 2012
- Vegan Cheese: Casein, Casomorphins, and the Daiya Redwoods Vegusto Taste Test July 4, 2012
- Born Vegan at Vegfest UK, with Ruby Roth, Mair Perkins, and a studio audience May 31, 2012
- Born Vegan: from 1976 UK TV to the Hebrew Israelites, three very different vegan childhoods May 1, 2012
- Lab Meat: Can in vitro meat save the animals? With Nicholas Genovese, David Pearce, and Jordi Casamitjana April 3, 2012
- Rebel Poet: Benjamin Zephaniah discusses the life of Abul ʿala Al-Maʿarri (أبو العلاء المعري), the medieval Arab vegan philosopher poet March 6, 2012
- Digital Vegans: with Happy Cow founder, iPhone apps, London Vegans, and Kerry McCarthy MP January 30, 2012
- Peace on Earth: will we ever have it? With Peter Singer and Gary Francione discussing Steven Pinker’s “The Better Angels of our Nature” December 20, 2011
- Veganism in Politics: The British Parliament Debates World Vegan Day December 13, 2011
- Veganism in Politics: Chris Williamson MP, Cathy Jamieson MP and Kerry McCarthy MP answer your questions December 1, 2011
- Veganism in Politics: Chris Williamson MP, Cathy Jamieson MP and Kerry McCarthy MP with questions from Dennis Kucinich and Maneka Gandhi November 1, 2011
- The Pledge: the London Vegan Campaigns challenge to go vegan for a month October 11, 2011
- A very small sneak peek. October 11, 2011